One might love to view my submit #68 written on commenting at the submit #61 of our buddy within the thread “Why Jesus will have to be the Messiah ” on RF:
paarsurrey : #68
bxx 2 mentioned: #61
It’s no longer so simple as that.
Paul says his Jesus used to be descended from David (Romans 1: 3), however provides no different element, no longer even the names of his earthly folks.
Mark says his Jesus used to be no longer descended from David (Mark 12:35-37).
The Jesuses of Matthew (Matthew 1:2-16 for Joesph) and of Luke (Luke 3:23+ for Joseph) are within the absurd place of being claimed to be descended from David, however that’s supported through two faux and incompatible genealogies which anyway are expressly for Joseph, who out loud and proud is NOT Jesus’ father.
John’s Jesus (John 7:42) is claimed to be descended from David, however as with Paul, no different main points are given.
So if we put it to a vote, 3 (Mark, Matthew, Luke) aren’t descended from David, and two (Paul, John) are mentioned to be, however through naked statement since we’re no longer informed how.
The numbers are in opposition to you.
And I will be able to’t see any reason why in any respect why any mainstream Jew in Galilee or Judea will have to or would acknowledge Jesus because the Messiah, since he used to be neither a civil chief, an army chief, or a…
